Molecular and Electronic Structures of Homoleptic Six-Coordinate Cobalt(I) Complexes of 2,2′:6′,2″-Terpyridine, 2,2′-Bipyridine, and 1,10-Phenanthroline. An Experimental and Computational Study
† Max Planck Institute for Chemical Energy Conversion, Stiftstrasse 34−36, D-45470 Mülheim an der Ruhr,Germany
§ Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria
Inorg. Chem., Article ASAP
DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.5b02415
Publication Date (Web): December 4, 2015
Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society
*E-mail: mihail.atanasov@cec.mpg.de., *E-mail: karl.wieghardt@cec.mpg.de.
Abstract
The crystal structures of nine homoleptic, pseudooctahedral cobalt complexes, 1–9, containing either 2,2′:6′,2″-terpyridine (tpy), 4,4′-di-tert-butyl-2,2′-bipyridine (tbpy), or 1,10-phenanthroline (phen) ligands have been determined in three oxidation levels, namely, cobalt(III), cobalt(II), and, for the first time, the corresponding presumed cobalt(I) species. The intraligand bond distances in the complexes [CoI(tpy0)2]+, [CoI(tbpy0)3]+, and [CoI(phen0)3]+ are identical, within experimental error, not only with those in the corresponding trications and dications but also with the uncoordinated neutral ligands tpy0, bpy0, and phen0. On this basis, a cobalt(I) oxidation state assignment can be inferred for the monocationic complexes. The trications are clearly low-spin CoIII (S = 0) species, and the dicationic species [CoII(tpy0)2]2+, [CoII(tbpy0)3]2+, and [CoII(phen0)3]2+ contain high-spin (S = 3/2) CoII. Notably, the cobalt(I) complexes do not display any structural indication of significant metal-to-ligand (t2g → π*) π-back-donation effects. Consistent with this proposal, the temperature-dependent molar magnetic susceptibilities of the three cobalt(I) species have been recorded (3–300 K) and a common S = 1 ground state confirmed. In contrast to the corresponding electronic spectra of isoelectronic (and isostructural) [NiII(tpy0)2]2+, [NiII(bpy0)3]2+, and [NiII(phen0)3]2+, which display d → d bands with very small molar extinction coefficients (ε < 60 M–1 cm–1), the spectra of the cobalt(I) species exhibit intense bands (ε > 103 M–1 cm–1) in the visible and near-IR regions. Density functional theory (DFT) calculations using the B3LYP functional have validated the experimentally derived electronic structure assignments of the monocations as cobalt(I) complexes with minimal cobalt-to-ligand π-back-bonding. Similar calculations for the six-coordinate neutral complexes [CoII(tpy•)2]0 and [CoII(bpy•)2(bpy0)]0 point to a common S = 3/2 ground state, each possessing a central high-spin CoII ion and two π-radical anion ligands. In addition, the excited-states and ground state magnetic properties of [CoI(tpy0)2][CoI−(CO)4] have been explored by variable-temperature variable-magnetic-field magnetic circular dichroism (MCD) spectroscopy. A series of strong signals associated with the paramagnetic monocation exhibit pronounced C-term behavior indicative of the presence of metal-to-ligand charge-transfer bands [in contrast to d–d transitions of the nickel(II) analogue]. Time-dependent DFT calculations have allowed assignment of these transitions as Co(3d) → π*(tpy) excitations. Metal-to-ligand charge-transfer states intermixing with the Co(d8) multiplets explain the remarkably large (and negative) zero-field-splitting parameter D obtained from SQUID and MCD measurements. Ground-state electron- and spin-density distributions of [CoI(tpy0)2]+ have been investigated by multireference electronic structure methods: complete active-space self-consistent field (CASSCF) and N-electron perturbation theory to second order (NEVPT2). Both correlated CASSCF/NEVPT2 and spin-unrestricted B3LYP-based DFT calculations show a significant delocalization of the spin density from the CoI dxz,yz orbitals toward the empty π* orbitals located on the two central pyridine fragments in the trans position. This spin density is of an alternating α,β-spin polarization type (McConnel mechanism I) and is definitely not due to magnetic metal-to-radical coupling. A comparison of these results with those for [NiII(tpy0)2]2+ (S = 1) is presented.
コメント